Type of publication:

Journal article

Author(s):

*Thusoo, Varun; Chakrapani, Arjun S; Nehru, Ashish; Kudyar, Sachin; Nagpal, Brahmpreet; Kv, Alok; S, Ebin; Jose, Akhil.

Citation:

Cureus. 16(11):e74226, 2024 Nov.

Abstract:

OBJECTIVES: The objectives of this study are to determine the functional outcomes and compare them between conservative and surgical management in patients managed for closed-type intra-articular distal end of radius fractures.

METHODS: A prospective observational study was done on 150 patients who underwent treatment for closed-type intra-articular distal end of radius fractures. As per Frykman Classification, they were type III. patients were either managed conservatively, i.e. 100 patients out of 150 and surgical management was done in 50 cases. For surgical management, implants used were K-wires, Schanz pins, and Ellis Plate. The functional outcomes were noted in terms of pain and range of motion, in the follow up of six months. Union was noted clinically and radiologically.

RESULTS: The mean age of the study patients was 42.32 +/- 15.77 years. Out of 150 patients, there were 100 (66.67%) male patients. Compared to conservative management, surgical management had significantly lesser time of union (12 vs. 20 weeks, P<0.0001); significantly more excellent results (44% vs. 30%), more good results (32% vs. 15%) (P=0.003); comparable pain score (P=0.236); and comparable functional score (P=0.661). Regarding radiological outcomes, surgical management had significantly more volar tilt (9.6+/-2.5degree vs. 8+/-5degree, P=0.035); lesser Ulnar variance (3+/-2 vs. 4+/-2 mm, P=0.004), lesser grip strength <50% (26% vs. 65%, P<0.0001); comparable radial inclination (21+/-4degree vs. 20+/-5degree, P=0.661); and comparable radial height (11+/-3 vs. 10+/-5 mm, P=0.195)

CONCLUSION: To conclude, surgery for distal radius fractures promotes faster healing, lesser pain, lesser malunion, and better functional outcomes. However, it is not without potential risks. Non-surgical treatment is still a suitable option, for patients with contraindications to surgery or having lower need for functional improvement.

Link to full-text [open access - no password required]

Type of publication:

Journal article

Author(s):

Hamid, Muhammad A; *Younis, Zubair; Mannan, Muhammad; Shrivastava, Nayan; Prabhu, Rudra M.

Citation:

Cureus. 16(11):e74302, 2024 Nov.

Abstract:

INTRODUCTION: Clavicle fractures are routinely encountered in orthopedic clinical practice and have often been the subject of debate when it comes to optimal treatment. Clavicle fracture surgery has come a long way with excellent pre-contoured superior locking plates available for fixation. This study aimed to evaluate a cohort of patients operated for displaced mid-shaft clavicle fractures by open reduction and internal fixation using superior clavicle locking plates.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study of mid-shaft clavicle fracture patients who were operated on and had their fractures fixed using superior clavicle locking plates. We identified a total of 29 patients to be included in this study. The primary outcome measure was the quickDASH score at the time of discharge (12 weeks from surgery). Secondary outcome measures were the pattern and frequency of complications, and the need for metalwork removal.

RESULTS: Our study had a male preponderance, with 19 (65.5%) patients being male. The most common mode of trauma was fracture secondary to a road traffic accident in 12 (41.4%) patients. All but one fracture united uneventfully. The mean quickDASH score was 0.94 at 12-week follow-up. Complications were noted in 12 (41.4%) patients, and the most common complication was hardware irritation in seven (24.1%) patients, followed by dysesthesia around the surgical scar in five (17.2%) patients.

CONCLUSION: Open reduction and internal fixation of the clavicle give a high likelihood of fracture union along with good shoulder function. In a particular cohort of patients, this offers a quick recovery and earlier return to activity. However, this must be balanced with the risk of complications in a considerable proportion of operated patients, some of which might necessitate a second surgery.

Link to full-text [open access - no password required]

Type of publication:

Journal article

Author(s):

*Younis, Zubair; Hamid, Muhammad A; *Khan, Muhammad Murtaza; Sapra, Rahul; *Gurukiran, Gurukiran; *Singh, Rohit.

Citation:

Cureus. 16(11):e73461, 2024 Nov.

Abstract:

Background Outpatient clinics are increasingly challenged by high patient volumes and rising "did not attend" (DNA) rates, leading to extended wait times and declines in patient satisfaction. Traditional follow-up (FU) models with routinely scheduled appointments contribute to inefficiencies, as stable patients may attend unnecessary visits, thus straining clinic resources. The patient-initiated follow-up (PIFU) model offers an alternative where patients schedule appointments only when necessary. This study evaluates PIFU's efficacy in improving outpatient services and patient satisfaction by reducing routine appointments and prioritizing patient-driven follow-up. Methods This service evaluation and patient satisfaction audit was conducted at the fracture clinic of Royal Shrewsbury Hospital over three months (December 2023-March 2024). Out of 3828 patients seen, 203 were assigned to PIFU based on criteria indicating stable conditions with minimal follow-up requirements. The remaining patients were either scheduled for routine follow-ups or discharged. Data were collected retrospectively from clinic records, and a structured
questionnaire assessed patient satisfaction with the PIFU service. Results Among the 203 patients assigned to PIFU, 183 (90.15%) patients received an informational leaflet, with all respondents finding it easy to understand. However, only 41 (20.2%) of patients utilized the PIFU service, primarily for concerns about pain, healing, or complications. Satisfaction among PIFU users was high, with 163 (80.3%) patients rating the service 5/5. Non-users mostly cited no perceived need for follow-up. Demographic analysis indicated that patients aged 40-60 were predominant (n=132; 65.02%) among the PIFU cohort. Conclusion The PIFU model demonstrated the potential to alleviate clinic workload by reducing routine follow-ups while maintaining high patient satisfaction. Although utilization rates were low, those who engaged found the service beneficial, suggesting PIFU's value for patients comfortable with self-management. Improved patient education may enhance engagement, supporting the broader implementation of PIFU in outpatient settings. Further research is warranted to explore barriers to patient-initiated follow-up and refine eligibility criteria for optimal outcomes.

Link to full-text [open access - no password required]

Type of publication:

Journal article

Author(s):

Younis, Zubair; Hamid, Muhammad A; Amin, Jebran; *Khan, Muhammad Murtaza; *Gurukiran, Gurukiran; Sapra, Rahul; *Singh, Rohit; Wani, Kubra Farooq; Younus, Zuhaib.

Citation:

Cureus. 16(11):e73075, 2024 Nov.

Abstract:

Proximal humerus fractures are prevalent in older adults, particularly women, primarily due to osteoporosis and increased fall risk. These fractures often result from low-energy falls in elderly patients, while in younger individuals, they are more likely to occur with high-energy trauma, which may involve additional injuries to soft tissue and neurovascular structures. Proper anatomical understanding, including key structures and blood supply, is crucial for effective management and to prevent complications. Several classification systems assist in guiding treatment for proximal humerus fractures, including Codman's, Neer's, Arbeitsgemeinschaft fur Osteosynthesefragen/Orthopaedic Trauma Association (AO/OTA) system, and the Codman-Hertel system, which helps predict ischemia risk. Evaluation of proximal humerus fractures begins with Advanced Trauma Life Support (ATLS) protocols, emphasizing a thorough shoulder assessment, particularly focusing on skin integrity in elderly patients. Neurological and vascular examinations are essential due to the common occurrence of nerve injuries, especially involving the axillary nerve. Imaging typically includes multiple standard views, with advanced imaging reserved for complex cases and for assessing associated soft tissue injuries. Treatment options range from conservative management for stable fractures to surgical intervention for more complex cases. Surgical choices include techniques like fixation, nailing, and various arthroplasty options, with some procedures potentially offering advantages for older adults with bone quality or soft tissue challenges. Rehabilitation is a vital component of recovery, with emphasis on early mobility and gradual strengthening to restore function, especially in older patients. Complications following open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) for proximal humerus fractures can include issues such as non-union, malunion, osteonecrosis, infection, joint stiffness, and fixation failure. In cases where non-union or fixation failure occurs, revision surgery or arthroplasty may be necessary. Joint stiffness may require further intervention if physical therapy is insufficient, while symptomatic osteonecrosis might also need surgical management. Malunion is generally better tolerated in older patients but may require correction in younger individuals. Other surgical options, such as hemiarthroplasty (HA) and reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA), share similar risks, including infection, fractures, complications at the tuberosity, stiffness, and instability. RSA may be favored when there are tuberosity or rotator cuff issues. Closed reduction with percutaneous pinning carries a high risk of pin migration and malunion, which can result in deformities, pain, and dysfunction. Proper anatomical knowledge is essential to avoid neurovascular injury and to manage common issues such as pin-site infections effectively.

Link to full-text [open access - no password required]