Type of publication:

Journal article

Author(s):

*Thusoo, Varun; Chakrapani, Arjun S; Nehru, Ashish; Kudyar, Sachin; Nagpal, Brahmpreet; Kv, Alok; S, Ebin; Jose, Akhil.

Citation:

Cureus. 16(11):e74226, 2024 Nov.

Abstract:

OBJECTIVES: The objectives of this study are to determine the functional outcomes and compare them between conservative and surgical management in patients managed for closed-type intra-articular distal end of radius fractures.

METHODS: A prospective observational study was done on 150 patients who underwent treatment for closed-type intra-articular distal end of radius fractures. As per Frykman Classification, they were type III. patients were either managed conservatively, i.e. 100 patients out of 150 and surgical management was done in 50 cases. For surgical management, implants used were K-wires, Schanz pins, and Ellis Plate. The functional outcomes were noted in terms of pain and range of motion, in the follow up of six months. Union was noted clinically and radiologically.

RESULTS: The mean age of the study patients was 42.32 +/- 15.77 years. Out of 150 patients, there were 100 (66.67%) male patients. Compared to conservative management, surgical management had significantly lesser time of union (12 vs. 20 weeks, P<0.0001); significantly more excellent results (44% vs. 30%), more good results (32% vs. 15%) (P=0.003); comparable pain score (P=0.236); and comparable functional score (P=0.661). Regarding radiological outcomes, surgical management had significantly more volar tilt (9.6+/-2.5degree vs. 8+/-5degree, P=0.035); lesser Ulnar variance (3+/-2 vs. 4+/-2 mm, P=0.004), lesser grip strength <50% (26% vs. 65%, P<0.0001); comparable radial inclination (21+/-4degree vs. 20+/-5degree, P=0.661); and comparable radial height (11+/-3 vs. 10+/-5 mm, P=0.195)

CONCLUSION: To conclude, surgery for distal radius fractures promotes faster healing, lesser pain, lesser malunion, and better functional outcomes. However, it is not without potential risks. Non-surgical treatment is still a suitable option, for patients with contraindications to surgery or having lower need for functional improvement.

Link to full-text [open access - no password required]

Type of publication:

Journal article

Author(s):

Hamid, Muhammad A; *Younis, Zubair; Mannan, Muhammad; Shrivastava, Nayan; Prabhu, Rudra M.

Citation:

Cureus. 16(11):e74302, 2024 Nov.

Abstract:

INTRODUCTION: Clavicle fractures are routinely encountered in orthopedic clinical practice and have often been the subject of debate when it comes to optimal treatment. Clavicle fracture surgery has come a long way with excellent pre-contoured superior locking plates available for fixation. This study aimed to evaluate a cohort of patients operated for displaced mid-shaft clavicle fractures by open reduction and internal fixation using superior clavicle locking plates.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study of mid-shaft clavicle fracture patients who were operated on and had their fractures fixed using superior clavicle locking plates. We identified a total of 29 patients to be included in this study. The primary outcome measure was the quickDASH score at the time of discharge (12 weeks from surgery). Secondary outcome measures were the pattern and frequency of complications, and the need for metalwork removal.

RESULTS: Our study had a male preponderance, with 19 (65.5%) patients being male. The most common mode of trauma was fracture secondary to a road traffic accident in 12 (41.4%) patients. All but one fracture united uneventfully. The mean quickDASH score was 0.94 at 12-week follow-up. Complications were noted in 12 (41.4%) patients, and the most common complication was hardware irritation in seven (24.1%) patients, followed by dysesthesia around the surgical scar in five (17.2%) patients.

CONCLUSION: Open reduction and internal fixation of the clavicle give a high likelihood of fracture union along with good shoulder function. In a particular cohort of patients, this offers a quick recovery and earlier return to activity. However, this must be balanced with the risk of complications in a considerable proportion of operated patients, some of which might necessitate a second surgery.

Link to full-text [open access - no password required]