Cost of Tuberculosis (TB) screening and contact tracing an Eastern European immigrant population seasonally employed at an agricultural farm in the United Kingdom (2024)

Type of publication:

Conference abstract

Author(s):

*George S.; *Moudgil H.;

Citation:

European Respiratory Journal. Conference: European Respiratory Society International Congress, ERS 2024. Vienna Austria. 64(Supplement 68) (pp PA1475), 2024. Date of Publication: 01 Sep 2024.

Abstract:

Background: Economic data inform public health measures; a co-ordinated approach to TB contact tracing, guided by Public Health England (PHE), was undertaken assessing a non English speaking Eastern European immigrant population seasonally employed at an agricultural farm and we (1) report direct costs, (2) identify cultural issues and risks employing such a population Methods: After an initial pilot study of work-based contacts of an index case, contact lists incorporating workforce in every shift pattern back-dated two years to his UK entry were identified. Direct costs included T-spot testing (Oxford Immunotec) and translators (Romanian, Polish, Lithuanian, Italian) along with secondary care charges at tariff with uniform cross-charge among providers. TB drug costs (managing latent or disease) were from the British National Formulary.
Result(s): 258/331 (78%) workers took up testing. 80 (31%) were then referred for contact screening; of these, 47 had latent and 3 active disease. 16 defaulted, 5 declined, 4 were pregnant, and 5 lost moved elsewhere. Most had no registered General Practitioner and no pre-employment health check, BCG or radiology. Anecdotally, several returned to their parent countries for healthcare advice despite measures to overcome language barriers. Main direct costs (51,497-52) equated to 199-60/person screening and 1029-95/person treated for either latent or TB disease.
Conclusion(s): Language and cultural barriers are challenges to TB screening/contact tracing. Direct costs are 200 (UK pound sterling = 1.17 Euro) per patient screened and five times this amount treating latent or active disease.

Link to full-text [no password required]

Is the MMR vaccination programme failing to protect women against rubella infection? (2014)

Type of publication:
Journal article

Author(s):
*Skidmore S., Boxall E., Lord S.

Citation:
Epidemiology and Infection, 2014, vol./is. 142/5(1114-1117), 0950-2688;1469-4409 (2014)

Abstract:
In recent years the number of pregnant women susceptible to rubella has increased markedly. In the West Midlands the proportion has risen from 1.4% in 2004 to 6.9% in 2011. Locally, the proportion of non-immune women ranges from 1.6% in those born prior to 1976 to 17.8% in those born since 1986. The latter group comprises those given MMR in their second year with no further booster doses. The number of non-immune women will continue to rise as a consequence of low MMR uptake in the late 1990s. Repeat testing of samples with values

Link to more details or full-text: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23953764