Oncology

Over 70s breast cancer management: A single institute experience (2018)

Posted on by

Type of publication:
Conference abstract

Author(s):
Dube M.; Talaat A.; *Rastall S.; *Przyczyna A.; *Usman T.

Citation:
European Journal of Surgical Oncology; Jun 2018; vol. 44 (no. 6); p. 898

Abstract:
Introduction: With increasing life expectancy, awareness and improved referral system more women over the age of 70 (70+) are diagnosed with breast cancer. NICE guidelines recommended standard treatment of breast cancer irrespective of age and decision rather based on co-morbidities and frailty. To review our compliance with NICE guidelines we audited management of breast cancer of 70+ women over a period of five years. Methods: Retrospective case note analysis of 833 70+ women with breast cancer diagnosed from April 2010 to March 2015. Breast MDT recommendations, reason for choice of treatment, co-morbidities and performance status recorded. Results: Out of 2729 breast cancer diagnosis 30% (833) were 70+. The median age was 78. Surgery was the treatment of choice in all five years and is represented by 60% in year one, four and five; 55% in year two; 45% in year three. Primary endocrine treatment was the next treatment of choice among 28% in year one, 23% in year two, 30% in year three, 20% in year four, and 25% in year five. Offer and acceptance adjuvant treatments have increased in year wise analysis. Conclusions: We have noticed a shift towards surgery from primary endocrine therapy in year wise analysis. There has been an increase of number of 70+ patients diagnosed with breast cancer. Inclusion of performance status had improved offer of adjuvant treatment in the last year of the study. More individualised and evidence based management recommended to offer appropriate treatment in this age group.

Adding abiraterone or docetaxel to long-term hormone therapy for prostate cancer: directly randomised data from the STAMPEDE multi-arm, multi-stage platform protocol (2018)

Posted on by

Type of publication:
Journal article

Author(s):
Sydes, M R; Spears, M R; Mason, M D; Clarke, N W; Dearnaley, D P; de Bono, J S; Attard, G; Chowdhury, S; Cross, W; Gillessen, S; Malik, Z I; Jones, R; Parker, C C; Ritchie, A W S; Russell, J M; Millman, R; Matheson, D; Amos, C; Gilson, C; Birtle, A; Brock, S; Capaldi, L; Chakraborti, P; Choudhury, A; Evans, L; Ford, D; Gale, J; Gibbs, S; Gilbert, D C; Hughes, R; McLaren, D; Lester, J F; Nikapota, A; O'Sullivan, J; Parikh, O; Peedell, C; Protheroe, A; Rudman, S M; Shaffer, R; Sheehan, D; Simms, M; *Srihari, N; Strebel, R; Sundar, S; Tolan, S; Tsang, D; Varughese, M; Wagstaff, J; Parmar, M K B; James, N D; STAMPEDE Investigators

Citation:
Annals of Oncology : Official Journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology; May 2018; vol. 29 (no. 5); p. 1235-1248

Abstract:
 Background Adding abiraterone acetate with prednisolone (AAP) or docetaxel with prednisolone (DocP) to standard-of-care (SOC) each improved survival in systemic therapy for advanced or metastatic prostate cancer: evaluation of drug efficacy: a multi-arm multi-stage platform randomised controlled protocol recruiting patients with high-risk locally advanced or metastatic PCa starting long-term androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). The protocol provides the only direct, randomised comparative data of SOC+AAP versus SOC+DocP. Method Recruitment to SOC+DocP and SOC+AAP overlapped November 2011 to March 2013. SOC was long-term ADT or, for most non-metastatic cases, ADT for≥2years and RT to the primary tumour. Stratified randomisation allocated pts 2:1:2 to SOC; SOC+docetaxel 75mg/m2 3-weekly×6+prednisolone 10mg daily; or SOC+abiraterone acetate 1000mg+prednisolone 5mg daily. AAP duration depended on stage and intent to give radical RT. The primary outcome measure was death from any cause. Analyses used Cox proportional hazards and flexible parametric models, adjusted for stratification factors. This was not a formally powered comparison. A hazard ratio (HR) <1 favours SOC+AAP, and HR>1 favours SOC+DocP. Results A total of 566 consenting patients were contemporaneously randomised: 189 SOC+DocP and 377 SOC+AAP. The patients, balanced by allocated treatment were: 342 (60%) M1; 429 (76%) Gleason 8-10; 449 (79%) WHO performance status 0; median age 66years and median PSA 56ng/ml. With median follow-up 4years, 149 deaths were reported. For overall survival, HR=1.16 (95% CI 0.82-1.65); failure-free survival HR=0.51 (95% CI 0.39-0.67); progression-free survival HR=0.65 (95% CI 0.48-0.88); metastasis-free survival HR=0.77 (95% CI 0.57-1.03); prostate cancer-specific survival HR=1.02 (0.70-1.49); and symptomatic skeletal events HR=0.83 (95% CI 0.55-1.25). In the safety population, the proportion reporting≥1 grade 3, 4 or 5 adverse events ever was 36%, 13% and 1% SOC+DocP, and 40%, 7% and 1% SOC+AAP; prevalence 11% at 1 and 2 years on both arms. Relapse treatment patterns varied by arm. Conclusions This direct, randomised comparative analysis of two new treatment standards for hormone-naïve prostate cancer showed no evidence of a difference in overall or prostate cancer-specific survival, nor in other important outcomes such as symptomatic skeletal events. Worst toxicity grade over entire time on trial was similar but comprised different toxicities in line with the known properties of the drugs.Trial registration Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT00268476.

Altmetrics

A pilot experience in using a digital app to follow-up prostate cancer patients in Shropshire, UK (2018)

Posted on by

Type of publication:
Conference abstract

Author(s):
*Phan Y.; *Loh A.; *Anandakumar A.; *Umranikar S.; *Elves A.

Citation:
European Urology, Supplements; Mar 2018; vol. 17 (no. 2)

Abstract:
Introduction & Objective: It is not uncommon for patients with cancer to experience physical, mental and social distress, forming a significant burden that has a negative impact on their quality of life. We have piloted a digital app called VitruCare in our hospital in order to address these issues in patients with prostate cancer. More importantly, the app also serves as a communication tool between the hospital medical team and the patients. Materials and Methods: Patients with prostate cancer were invited to use VitruCare in our pilot study. 53 users were followed prospectively. Data on various domains such as "My Goals", "My Lifestyle", "My Priorities", "My Diaries", and "How Do I Feel Today" were analysed retrospectively. Results: The users of this application have a median age of 72.5 years old. 14% have nodal or bone metastasis, and median time since treatment is 48 months. 60% have completed the lifestyle questionnaire and "How Do I Feel Today" trackers. 20% of the users who completed the lifestyle questionnaire reported anxiety. 42% have used the diary function and 47% have used the secured messaging function. Usage of the lifestyle questionnaire, "How Do I Feel Today" trackers, secured messaging and diary functions does not appear to be age related. Patients who have been treated and further away from treatment in time are more likely to be used the app. Conclusions: The level of engagement in this pilot study reflects the willingness of patients to utilize this innovative app that has the potential to monitor the well-being of patients with prostate cancer out with the constraints of a fixed clinic appointment.

A pilot experience in using a digital app to follow-up prostate cancer patients in Shropshire, UK (2017)

Posted on by

Type of publication:
Conference abstract

Author(s):
*Phan Y.; *Loh A.; *Anandakumar A.; *Umranikar S.; *Elves A.

Citation:
Journal of Endourology; Sep 2017; vol. 31, S2

Abstract:
Introduction & Objective: It is not uncommon for patients with cancer to experience physical, mental and social distress, forming a significant burden that has a negative impact on their quality of life. We have piloted a digital app called VitruCare in our hospital in order to address these issues in patients with prostate cancer. More importantly, the app also serves as a communication tool between the hospital medical team and the patients. Materials and Methods: Patients with prostate cancer were invited to use VitruCare in our pilot study. 53 users were followed prospectively. Data on various domains such as "My Goals", "My Lifestyle", "My Priorities", "My Diaries", and "How Do I Feel Today" were analysed retrospectively. Results: The users of this application have a median age of 72.5 years old. 14% have nodal or bone metastasis, and median time since treatment is 48 months. 60% have completed the lifestyle questionnaire and "How Do I Feel Today" trackers. 20% of the users who completed the lifestyle questionnaire reported anxiety. 42% have used the diary function and 47% have used the secured messaging function. Usage of the lifestyle questionnaire, "How Do I Feel Today" trackers, secured messaging and diary functions does not appear to be age related. Patients who have been treated and further away from treatment in time are more likely to be used the app. Conclusions: The level of engagement in this pilot study reflects the willingness of patients to utilize this innovative app that has the potential to monitor the well-being of patients with prostate cancer out with the constraints of a fixed clinic appointment.

3 versus 6 months of adjuvant oxaliplatin-fluoropyrimidine combination therapy for colorectal cancer (SCOT): an international, randomised, phase 3, non-inferiority trial (2018)

Posted on by

Type of publication:
Randomised controlled trial

Author(s):
Iveson TJ, Kerr RS, Saunders MP, Cassidy J, Hollander NH, Tabernero J, Haydon A, Glimelius B, Harkin A, Allan K, McQueen J, Scudder C, Boyd KA, Briggs A, Waterston A, Medley L, Wilson C, Ellis R, Essapen S, Dhadda AS, Harrison M, Falk S, Raouf S, Rees C, Olesen RK, Propper D, Bridgewater J, Azzabi A, Farrugia D, Webb A, Cunningham D, Hickish T, Weaver A, Gollins S, Wasan HS, Paul J. [SaTH was one of the sites this trial took place at]

Citation:
Lancet Oncology 2018 Apr;19(4):562-578

Abstract:
BACKGROUND: 6 months of oxaliplatin-containing chemotherapy is usually given as adjuvant treatment for stage 3 colorectal cancer. We investigated whether 3 months of oxaliplatin-containing chemotherapy would be non-inferior to the usual 6 months of treatment.
METHODS: The SCOT study was an international, randomised, phase 3, non-inferiority trial done at 244 centres. Patients aged 18 years or older with high-risk stage II and stage III colorectal cancer underwent central randomisation with minimisation for centre, choice of regimen, sex, disease site, N stage, T stage, and the starting dose of capecitabine. Patients were assigned (1:1) to receive 3 months or 6 months of adjuvant oxaliplatin-containing chemotherapy. The chemotherapy regimens could consist of CAPOX (capecitabine and oxaliplatin) or FOLFOX (bolus and infused fluorouracil with oxaliplatin). The regimen was selected before randomisation in accordance with choices of the patient and treating physician. The primary study endpoint was disease-free survival and the non-inferiority margin was a hazard ratio of 1·13. The primary analysis was done in the intention-to-treat population and safety was assessed in patients who started study treatment. This trial is registered with ISRCTN, number ISRCTN59757862, and follow-up is continuing.
FINDINGS: 6088 patients underwent randomisation between March 27, 2008, and Nov 29, 2013. The intended treatment was FOLFOX in 1981 patients and CAPOX in 4107 patients. 3044 patients were assigned to 3 month group and 3044 were assigned to 6 month group. Nine patients in the 3 month group and 14 patients in the 6 month group did not consent for their data to be used, leaving 3035 patients in the 3 month group and 3030 patients in the 6 month group for the intention-to-treat analyses. At the cutoff date for analysis, there had been 1482 disease-free survival events, with 740 in the 3 month group and 742 in the 6 month group. 3 year disease-free survival was 76·7% (95% CI 75·1-78·2) for the 3 month group and 77·1% (75·6-78·6) for the 6 month group, giving a hazard ratio of 1·006 (0·909-1·114, test for non-inferiority p=0·012), significantly below the non-inferiority margin. Peripheral neuropathy of grade 2 or worse was more common in the 6 month group (237 [58%] of 409 patients for the subset with safety data) than in the 3 month group (103 [25%] of 420) and was long-lasting and associated with worse quality of life. 1098 serious adverse events were reported (492 reports in the 3 month group and 606 reports in the 6 month group) and 32 treatment-related deaths occurred (16 in each group).
INTERPRETATION: In the whole study population, 3 months of oxaliplatin-containing adjuvant chemotherapy was non-inferior to 6 months of the same therapy for patients with high-risk stage II and stage III colorectal cancer and was associated with reduced toxicity and improved quality of life. Despite the fact the study was underpowered, these data suggest that a shorter duration leads to similar survival outcomes with better quality of life and thus might represent a new standard of care.
FUNDING: Medical Research Council, Swedish Cancer Society, NETSCC, and Cancer Research UK.

Link to full-text [Open access - no password required]

Altmetrics

Breast reconstruction affects coping mechanisms in breast cancer survivors (2017)

Posted on by

Type of publication:
Journal article

Author(s):
*Lake, B., Fuller, H.R., *Rastall, S, *Usman, T

Citation:
Indian Journal of Surgery, December 2017

Abstract:
Coping strategies used by women with breast cancer are vital for adjustment to their disease. Whilst it is clear that factors such as age at diagnosis, social support and ethnicity can influence coping mechanisms, there is currently no information about whether breast reconstruction changes mechanisms of coping for such patients. The aims of this study, therefore, were to determine how women who have had immediate breast reconstruction and mastectomy cope, compared to those who have mastectomy alone, and whether there are differences in coping mechanisms due to breast reconstruction surgery. This was a retrospective cohort study, using a standardised questionnaire called the Brief Cope Scale. Inclusion criteria was the following: all women who had immediate breast reconstruction and mastectomy in Shropshire from 2003 to 2014 for ductal carcinoma in situ or node-negative invasive breast cancer. Each patient was matched for year of diagnosis, adjuvant therapy and age to one woman who had mastectomy alone. Two hundred thirty-four questionnaires were sent with a 58% response rate. Significantly more patients from the reconstruction cohort coped by active coping (T value 1.66, P value 0.04) compared to those in the mastectomy alone cohort. In contrast, significantly more patients in the mastectomy alone cohort coped by active venting compared to the reconstruction cohort (T value 1.71, P value 0.04). This study indicates for the first time that breast reconstruction may alter coping mechanisms in breast cancer survivors. Awareness of these coping mechanisms will enable clinicians to provide appropriate, individualised support.

Thyroid-stimulating hormone suppression therapy for differentiated thyroid cancer: The role for a combined T3/T4 approach (2017)

Posted on by

Type of publication:
Journal article

Author(s):
*Fussey, Jonathan Mark; Khan, Habib; *Ahsan, Farhan; *Prashant, Ravi; Pettit, *Laura

Citation:
Head & neck; Dec 2017; vol. 39 (no. 12); p. 2567-2572

Abstract:
BACKGROUND In the management of differentiated thyroid carcinoma, surgery with or without postoperative radioiodine, and thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) suppression is the standard of care in most patients. Levothyroxine is recommended for long-term TSH suppression. For some patients, this may be difficult to tolerate due to adverse effects, such as impaired cognitive function.METHODS This article reviews the evidence for the role of combination treatment with triiodothyronine (T3) and levothyroxine (T4) in these patients.RESULTS The evidence for combination T3 and T4 treatment comes mainly from studies on hypothyroidism, and research into its use for TSH suppression is limited.CONCLUSION Although the evidence  base is not strong, there is a small group of patients who may benefit from combination T3 and T4 treatment due to difficulty tolerating thyroxine. Until further evidence is available, a case-by-case approach is recommended.

Link to full-text [Available to eligible users with an NHS OpenAthens account]

Altmetrics

Accelerated versus standard epirubicin followed by cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil or capecitabine as adjuvant therapy for breast cancer in the randomised UK TACT2 trial (CRUK/05/19): a multicentre, phase 3, open-label, randomised, controlled trial (2017)

Posted on by

Type of publication:
Randomised controlled trial

Author(s):
David Cameron, James P Morden, Peter Canney, Galina Velikova, Robert Coleman, John Bartlett, *Rajiv Agrawal, Jane Banerji, Gianfilippo Bertelli, David Bloomfield, A Murray Brunt, Helena Earl, Paul Ellis, Claire Gaunt, Alexa Gillman, Nicholas Hearfield, Robert Laing, Nicholas Murray, Niki Couper, Robert C Stein, Mark Verrill, Andrew Wardley, Peter Barrett-Lee, Judith M Bliss, on behalf of the TACT2 Investigators

Citation:
Lancet Oncology; Jul 2017; vol. 18 (no. 7); p. 929-945

Abstract:
Adjuvant chemotherapy for early breast cancer has improved outcomes but causes toxicity. The UK TACT2 trial used a 2 × 2 factorial design to test two hypotheses: whether use of accelerated epirubicin would improve time to tumour recurrence (TTR); and whether use of oral capecitabine instead of cyclophosphamide would be non-inferior in terms of patients’ outcomes and would improve toxicity, quality of life, or both.

Link to full-text [Open access]

Altmetrics

Establishing a large prospective clinical cohort in people with head and neck cancer as a biomedical resource: head and neck 5000 (2015)

Posted on by

Type of publication:
Journal article

Author(s):
Ness A.R., Waylen A., Hurley K., Jeffreys M., Penfold C., Pring M., Leary S., Allmark C., Toms S., Ring S., Peters T.J., Hollingworth W., Worthington H., Nutting C., Fisher S., Rogers S.N., Thomas S.J., Rogers S., Thiruchelvam J.K., Abdelkader M., Anari S., Mehanna H., Sheehan T., Dyker K., McCaul J., Benson R., Stewart S., Hall C., Lester J., Homer J., Hamid A., Lamont A., Fresco L., Lester S., Cogill G., Roy A., Foran B., Bisase B., Balfour A., Evans A., Gollins S., Conway D., Gunasekaran S.P., Lees L., Lowe R., England J., Scrase C., Wight R., Sen M., Doyle M., Moule R., Goodchild K., Rowell N., Beaumont-Jewell D., Loo H.W., Jankowska P., Paleri V., Casasola R., Roques T., Tierney P., Hwang D., Dyson P., Andrade G., Tatla T., Christian J., Winter S., Baldwin A., Davies J., King E., Barnes D., Repanos C., Kim D., Richards S., Dallas N., McAlister K., Berry S., Cole N., Moss L., Palaniappan N., Evans M., Siva M., *Hari C. , Wood K., Simcock R., Waldron J., Hyde N., Ahmed I., Gahir D., O'Hara J., Carr R., Forster M., Thomas S., Wagstaff L., Mano J., Brammer C., Tyler J., Coatesworth A.

Citation:
BMC Cancer, December 2014, vol./is. 14/1, 1471-2407 (December 17, 2014)

Abstract:
Background: Head and neck cancer is an important cause of ill health. Survival appears to be improving but the reasons for this are unclear. They could include evolving aetiology, modifications in care, improvements in treatment or changes in lifestyle behaviour. Observational studies are required to explore survival trends and identify outcome predictors. Methods: We are identifying people with a new diagnosis of head and neck cancer. We obtain consent that includes agreement to collect longitudinal data, store samples and record linkage. Prior to treatment we give participants three questionnaires on health and lifestyle, quality of life and sexual history. We collect blood and saliva samples, complete a clinical data capture form and request a formalin fixed tissue sample. At four and twelve months we complete further data capture forms and send participants further quality of life questionnaires. Discussion: This large clinical cohort of people with head and neck cancer brings together clinical data, patient-reported outcomes and biological samples in a single co-ordinated resource for translational and prognostic research.

Link to full-text: http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4301458