Type of publication:
Conference abstract

Author(s):
*Venkatasami M.; *Harrison K.;

Citation:
British Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. Conference: BAOMS Annual Scientific Meeting. London United Kingdom. 60(10) (pp e63), 2022. Date of Publication: December 2022.

Abstract:
Introduction/Aims: Osteosarcoma is the most common primary bone tumour, with 10% of cases affecting the head and neck. Osteosarcoma occurs later in life, usually, in the 4-5th decade with a male predilection and predominantly affects the mandible; the maxilla being the second-most affected site. Prognosis is strongly dependent on negative resection margins and neoadjuvant chemo-radiotherapy in select cases. Case Description: A 58 year-old male, non-smoker, presented with a lump in his left upper jaw which occasionally bled and got caught during mastication. Previous medical history included quiescent relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis and absent seizures. Clinical examination revealed a suspicious exophytic mass in the upper left tuberosity of the maxilla with no associated lymphadenopathy. <br/>Finding(s): Radiological investigations revealed a metabolically active left maxillary lesion with maxillary sinus destruction, representing primary malignancy with no nodal disease. Histological analysis of a punch biopsy revealed a fibrosseous lesion, referred to a sarcoma centre for interpretation. Immunohistochemistry showed AE1/AE3 and CK(MNF.116) positivity in occasional cells with a ki67 proliferation index of 60%. This was diagnostic of grade-2-3 osteosarcoma. Multidisciplinary management included neoadjuvant chemotherapy prior to total maxillectomy and dental prosthetic rehabilitation. Patient is still under follow-up. Conclusions/Clinical Relevance: This case of primary osteosarcoma of the maxilla is rare and scarcely reported in literature. Upon clinical appearance, this exophytic lesion could resemble squamous cell carcinoma, thus it is important to consider differential diagnoses, including osteosarcoma, which requires prompt and early specialist intervention to maximise the chances of negative surgical margins, which is the mainstay of treatment for disease prognosis.

Type of publication:
Journal article

Author(s):
Exley R.; Logan G.; Kent S.; McDonald C.; Hennedige A.; Henry A.; Dawoud B.; Kulkarni R.; Kyzas P.; Morrison R.; McCaul J.; Brandsma D.S.; Cashman H.; Swain A.; Java K.; Vithlani G.; Watson M.; Christopher M.; Murray S.; Baniulyte G.; Grant J.; Wareing S.; Kawalec A.; Ng T.; Reedy N.; Tavakoli M.; Underwood C.; Gowrishankar S.; Collins T.; Davies R.; Uppal S.; Elledge R.; Shaheen S.; O'Connor R.; King H.; Tudor-Green B.; Garg M.; Wareing J.; Wicks C.; Mitchell O.; Maarouf M.; Chohan P.; *Otukoya R.; Wu E.; Farooq S.; Brewer E.; King S.; Nandra B.; Stevenson S.; Stiles E.; Davies L.; Madattigowda R.; Mohindra A.; Gilbert K.; Young D.

Citation:
British Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 2022 Nov; Vol. 60 (9), pp. 1228-1233.

Abstract:
Cervicofacial infection (CFI) is a frequently encountered presentation to Oral and Maxillofacial Departments (OMFS). The United Kingdom has recently seen cessation of all routine community dental treatment due to the Coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic and consequently an initial modification of treatment received in secondary care. Subsequent airway difficulties and the need for level 2 High Dependency Unit (HDU) or level 3 Intensive Care Unit (ICU) is a concern to surgeons and anaesthetists alike. The availability of skilled staff and appropriate facilities can be variable. It is imperative to understand the resource implications of CFI with respect to airway management and critical care utilisation. Adequate provision is fundamental for optimal care. A national, multicentre, trainee-led audit was carried out across 17 hospitals in the UK from May to September 2017. Information recorded included demographic features, presentation, airway management, medical and surgical treatment, and steroid administration. One thousand and two presentations (1002) were recorded. Forty-five percent were female, with a mean (range) age of 37.5 years (0-94). Regarding surgical airway management, 63.4% had a standard intubation (oral 42%, nasal 21.4%). Awake fibreoptic intubation (AFOI) was performed in 28% and surgical airway required in 0.9%. Impending airway compromise at the time of presentation was 1.7%. Following surgical incision and drainage, 96.1% of patients returned to a general ward, 2.7% to Level 3, and 1.1% to Level 2 care. The return to theatre was 2.8%, and 0.7% required reintubation. There was an association between corticosteroid administration and duration of intubation. Those who received steroids were more likely to remain intubated postoperatively (p = 0.006), require a higher level of postoperative care (p < 0.001), and require a return to theatre (p = 0.019). Postoperatively, patients who received steroids were less likely to be extubated at the close of the procedure. Intubated patients who received multiple steroid doses postoperatively were extubated with less frequency those that received a single dose. To our knowledge, this dataset is the largest ever recorded for CFI. Our results showed a high requirement for advanced airway management in this cohort. The requirement for surgical airway was low, but the significance of this situation should not be underestimated. The relatively frequent need for care at levels 2 or 3 within this cohort also placed a significant demand on already overburdened resources. Knowledge of care requirements for these patients will inform resource planning.