Pulmonary thromboembolism

Pulmonary Embolism Presenting As Shoulder and Back Pain: A Case Report (2024)

Posted on by

Type of publication:
Journal article

Author(s):
*Nwaneri, Chukwuemeka; *Race, Rebecca; *Oladele, Romoluwa; *Kumaran, Subramanian.

Citation:
Cureus. 16(7):e64016, 2024 Jul.

Abstract:
Pulmonary embolism (PE) is a common but life-threatening condition, and diagnosis can be challenging. Diagnosis is even more difficult in those patients with atypical presentations such as the absence of pleuritic chest pain, dyspnoea, tachycardia, or symptoms of deep vein thrombosis. We have delineated shoulder and back pain as an atypical sign of PE. However, the significant amount of misdiagnosis highlights the importance of other rare symptoms of this potentially fatal disease. Therefore, eliciting these rare presenting symptoms can significantly reduce morbidity and mortality. Here, we report the case of a patient who, 13 days after a laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication, presented to the emergency department (ED) with left shoulder and left-sided pleuritic back pain. She was managed in the resuscitation area in the ED and was subsequently diagnosed with a left-sided PE. Her care was taken over by the medical team, and she continued her recovery in the acute medical unit.

Link to full-text [no password required]

Categorising sub-massive pulmonary thromboembolism: No isolated role for shock index or its modified form (2019)

Posted on by

Type of publication:
Conference abstract

Author(s):
*Abdulsamad S.P.; *Crawford E.; *Makan A.; *Ahmad N.; *Srinivasan K.; *Moudgil H.

Citation:
European Respiratory Journal; Sep 2019; vol. 54, PA1469

Abstract:
Background and Objectives: Managing sub-massive pulmonary thromboembolism (PTE) remains a therapeutic challenge and efforts have been made to sub-categorise continued risk based on clinical assessment and objective measures such as a raised serum lactate (>4 mmol/l) or abnormal Shock Index (Heart rate/systolic blood pressure, SIndex). The objective here was to investigate the SIndex and its modified form (MSIndex) to (1) report frequency of abnormal results in a population being investigated for PTE and (2) assess potential benefits in avoiding adverse outcome.
Method(s): Retrospective analysis of 1505 CT pulmonary angiograms undertaken over a 12 month period. Abnormal SIndex was taken as outside limits 0.5-0.9. MSindex was calculated conventionally as heart rate divided by (2xdiastolic blood pressure+systolic blood pressure)/3 and considered abnormal if <0.7 or >1.3. Analysis was on Excel.
Result(s): Mean age for the population was 67.7 (range 17-101) years. 337/1505 (22.4%) scans showed PTE and of this population 19 patients had adverse outcome either died within 3 months (7 had malignancy) or requiring Intensive Care during the admission. For patients without PTE (n=1168), the SIndex was abnormal in 334(28.6%) and the MSindex in 293 (25.1%). For patients with PTE (n=337), respectively these figures were 89 (26.4%) and 68 (20.2%). Of those with adverse outcomes, 13/19 Sindex and 17/19 MSIndex values were not abnormal.
Conclusion(s): Neither the SIndex not the MSIndex are discriminatory in helping distinguish the at risk groups with PTE and therefore cannot be used as an isolated criteria.