Radiology

Radiological and Imaging Evidence in the Diagnosis and Management of Microbial Infections: An Update (2023)

Posted on by

Type of publication:
Journal article

Author(s):
Vaishnav, Aditya; *Gurukiran, Gurukiran; Ighodaro, Osazuwa; Kandi, Venkataramana

Citation:
Cureus. 15(11):e48756, 2023 Nov.

Abstract:
Microbial infections are extremely prevalent throughout the world. Bacteria, fungi, parasites, and viruses generally cause them. Most microbial infections spread from humans to humans and from animals to humans. A vast majority of microbial infections are self-limiting. However, some microbial infections result in severe morbidity and mortality. The diagnosis of microbial infections generally depends on the direct demonstration of microbes in human clinical specimens through microscopy followed by culture. Some microbes are uncultivable, and among those that are cultivable, some take a very long time to grow in the laboratory. This causes delays in the diagnosis that may result in poor patient outcomes. Serological and molecular methods like enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and polymerase chain reaction (PCR), respectively, have been extensively used to diagnose infectious diseases. However, these require costly infrastructure and adequate personnel training. In this context, alternative, more efficient, and rapid detection methods for the diagnosis of microbial infections are warranted. In this review, we comprehensively discuss the role played by radiological investigations in the diagnosis and management of infectious diseases.

Link to full-text [open access - no password required]

Altmetrics:

Accuracy of Radiomics in Predicting IDH Mutation Status in Diffuse Gliomas: A Bivariate Meta-Analysis (2024)

Posted on by

Type of publication:Journal article

Author(s):Di Salle, Gianfranco; Tumminello, Lorenzo; Laino, Maria Elena; *Shalaby, Sherif; Aghakhanyan, Gayane; Fanni, Salvatore Claudio; Febi, Maria; Shortrede, Jorge Eduardo; Miccoli, Mario; Faggioni, Lorenzo; Cosottini, Mirco; Neri, Emanuele.

Citation:Radiology Artificial intelligence. 6(1):e220257, 2024 Jan [epub ahead of print]

Abstract:Purpose To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis assessing the predictive accuracy of radiomics in the noninvasive determination of isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) status in grade 4 and lower-grade diffuse gliomas. Materials and Methods A systematic search was performed in the PubMed, Scopus, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases for relevant articles published between January 1, 2010, and July 7, 2021. Pooled sensitivity and specificity across studies were estimated. Risk of bias was evaluated using Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2, and methods were evaluated using the radiomics quality score (RQS). Additional subgroup analyses were performed according to tumor grade, RQS, and number of sequences used (PROSPERO ID: CRD42021268958). Results Twenty-six studies that included 3280 patients were included for analysis. The pooled sensitivity and specificity of radiomics for the detection of IDH mutation were 79% (95% CI: 76, 83) and 80% (95% CI: 76, 83), respectively. Low RQS scores were found overall for the included works. Subgroup analyses showed lower false-positive rates in very low RQS studies (RQS < 6) (meta-regression, z = -1.9; P = .02) compared with adequate RQS studies. No substantial differences were found in pooled sensitivity and specificity for the pure grade 4 gliomas group compared with the all-grade gliomas group (81% and 86% vs 79% and 79%, respectively) and for studies using single versus multiple sequences (80% and 77% vs 79% and 82%, respectively). Conclusion The pooled data showed that radiomics achieved good accuracy performance in distinguishing IDH mutation status in patients with grade 4 and lower-grade diffuse gliomas. The overall methodologic quality (RQS) was low and introduced potential bias.

Link to full-text [open access - no password required]

Altmetrics:

Radiology - Breast Screening (2022)

Posted on by

Type of publication:
Service improvement case study

Author(s):
*Cat Rowlands (Programme Manager), *Lynn Rogers (Office Manager), *Jayne Edwards (Office Supervisor), *Mr Usman (Director of Breast Screening)

Citation:
SaTH Improvement Hub, December 2022

Abstract:
In order to reduce the backlog of breast screening appointments, the service was temporarily centralised at RSH and PRH. This reduced the backlog from 17,141 to zero.

Link to PDF poster [no password required]

Recurrence of a second trimester fundal uterine rupture at the old scar site: A case report (2022)

Posted on by

Type of publication:Journal article

Author(s):*Panesar H.; *Patel R.; Dhaliwal H.

Citation:Radiology Case Reports. 17(11) (pp 4445-4448), 2022. Date of Publication: November 2022.

Abstract:Uterine rupture is a rare life-threatening complication. It can occur in all 3 trimesters with the first and the second being a rarity. It mainly occurs in the third trimester or during labor in a previously scarred uterus. It is rare in an unscarred uterus. The risk fold is further enhanced by the induction and augmentation with prostaglandins and oxytocin. The clinical diagnosis at this early gestation can be a dilemma to the attending physician as in this case. (1) The patient was a holidaymaker with no documented evidence of a dating scan to suggest any evidence of an ovarian/placental pathology at that stage. (2) The ultrasound findings in our department did suggest a viable intrauterine pregnancy with free fluid within both the adnexa. A 6 cm solid homogenous mass in the midline/right adnexa suggested an ovarian torsion or bowel pathology. The differentials in this particular case were that of a ruptured hemorrhagic cyst, ovarian torsion and even a heterotrophic pregnancy as there had been a few documented cases in the department. Ultrasound diagnosis of an intrauterine pregnancy together with a fluid collection does not suggest by any means that the uterus is intact or there is no ectopic pregnancy.

Link to full-text [open access - no password required]

Altmetrics:

The largest transcriptomic resource for radiotherapy-treated high-risk prostate cancer: paving the way for companion diagnostic biomarkers (2021)

Posted on by

Type of publication:Conference abstract

Author(s):Thiruthaneeswaran N.; Bibby B.; Pereira R.; More E.; Hoskin P.; Bristow R.; Choudhury A.; West C.; Wylie J.; *Denley H.; Henry A.

Citation:Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Oncology; Sep 2021; vol. 65 ; p. 252

Abstract:Purpose: The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) is a valuable resource for developing and validating gene signatures for personalising treatments. TCGA samples came from patients who received heterogeneous treatments-dominated by surgery. Improving the biological precision of radiotherapy is hampered by the lack of well annotated cohorts that reflect patient populations relevant for radiation oncologists. We aimed to generate transcriptomic data from needle core biopsies for a large multicentre cohort of high-risk prostate cancer patients and use the data to validate published gene signatures. Methods and materials: A total of 478 NCCN classified high-risk patients treated from 2008-2016 were identified: 244 patients received intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) to the prostate only (BEDalpha/beta 1.5-3Gy of 120-180 Gy) and 234 patients received IMRT to the prostate and a high dose rate (HDR) brachytherapy boost (BEDalpha/beta 1.5-3Gy 159-265 Gy). Androgen deprivation was given to all patients for 3-36 months. Biochemical failure was defined as prostate-specific antigen (PSA) rise of >=2 ng/ml above nadir post-radiotherapy. The primary clinical end-point was 7-year biochemical relapse-free survival (bRFS). Gene expression data were generated from diagnostic needle core biopsies using Affymetrix Clariom S arrays. Two (28-gene and 32 gene) published hypoxia gene signatures and a tumour radiosensitivity index (RSI) were tested for prognostic significance [1-3]. Result(s): The median follow-up for the entire cohort was 6.3 years. Both the 28 gene (p = 0.021) and 32-gene (p = 0.033) hypoxia signatures were prognostic for 7-year bRFS. Non-prostate hypoxia signatures were not prognostic. The bRFS for radioresistant (RSI-R) vs radiosensitive (RSI-S) was prognostic in the IMRT EBRT only cohort (p = 0.01) and not in the HDR boost cohort (p = 0.8). Conclusion(s): We generated the largest high-risk prostate radiotherapy cohort with full gene expression data and showed its value in validating published gene signatures. The RSI signature should be explored further to select patients with high-risk prostate cancer who should benefit from dose escalation with a HDR brachytherapy boost. This resource will be a valuable asset for future research generating and validating signatures for personalising radiotherapy in men with prostate cancer.

Link to full-text [no password required]

Digital mammographic interpretation by UK radiographer mammographers: A JAFROC analysis of observer performance (2021)

Posted on by

Type of publication:
Journal article

Author(s):
*Williams S.; *Aksoy U.; *Cielecki L.; Reed W.; Woznitza N.

Citation:
Radiography; Aug 2021; vol. 27 (no. 3); p. 915-919

Abstract:
Introduction: Radiologists utilise mammography test sets to bench mark their performance against recognised standards. Using a validated test set, this study compares the performance of radiographer readers against previous test results for radiologists. Method(s): Under similar test conditions radiographer readers were given an established test set of 60 mammograms and tasked to identify breast cancer, they were measured against their ability to identify, locate and give a confidence level for cancer being present on a standard set of mammographic images. The results were then compared to previously published results for radiologists for similar or the same test sets. Result(s): The 10 radiographer readers demonstrated similar results to radiologists and for lesion sensitivity were the highest scoring group. The study group score a sensitivity of 83; a specificity of 69.3 and lesion sensitivity of 74.8 with ROC and JAFROC scores of 0.86 and 0.74 respectively. Conclusion(s): Under test conditions radiographers are able to identify and accurately locate breast cancer in a range of complex mammographic backgrounds. Implications for practice: The study was performed under experimental conditions with results comparable to breast radiologists under similar conditions, translation of these findings into clinical practice will help address access and capacity issues in the timely identification and diagnosis of breast cancer.

Altmetrics: