The use of echocardiography in the management of shock in critical care: a prospective, multi-centre, observational study (2024)

Type of publication:
Journal article

Author(s):
Flower, Luke; Waite, Alicia; Boulton, Adam; Peck, Marcus; Akhtar, Waqas; Boyle, Andrew J; Gudibande, Sandeep; Ingram, Thomas E; Johnston, Brian; Marsh, Sarah; *Miller, Ashley; Nash, Amy; Olusanya, Olusegun; Parulekar, Prashant; Wagstaff, Daniel; Wilkinson, Jonathan; Proudfoot, Alastair G.

Citation:
Intensive Care Medicine. 2024 Aug 19. [epub ahead of print]

Abstract:
PURPOSE: Echocardiography is recommended as a first-line tool in the assessment of patients with shock. The current provision of echocardiography in critical care is poorly defined. The aims of this work were to evaluate the utilisation of echocardiography in patients presenting to critical care with shock, its impact on decision making, and adherence to governance guidelines. METHODS: We conducted a prospective, multi-centre, observational study in 178 critical care units across the United Kingdom (UK) and Crown Dependencies, led by the UK's Trainee Research in Intensive Care Network. Consecutive adult patients (>= 18 years) admitted with shock were followed up for 72 h to ascertain whether they received an echocardiogram, the nature of any scan performed, and its effect on critical treatment decision making. RESULTS: 1015 patients with shock were included. An echocardiogram was performed on 545 (54%) patients within 72 h and 436 (43%) within 24 h of admission. Most scans were performed by the critical care team (n = 314, 58%). Echocardiography was reported to either reduce diagnostic uncertainty or change management in 291 (54%) cases. Patients with obstructive or cardiogenic shock had their management altered numerically more often by echocardiography (n = 15 [75%] and n = 100 [58%] respectively). Twenty-five percent of echocardiograms performed adhered to current national governance and image storage guidance. CONCLUSION: Use of echocardiography in the assessment of patients with shock remains heterogenous. When echocardiography is used, it improves diagnostic certainty or changes management in most patients. Future research should explore barriers to increasing use of echocardiography in assessing patients presenting with shock.