Surgery

Acute cholecystectomy in elderly - age is not a limit (2021)

Posted on by

Type of publication:
Conference abstract

Author(s):
*Gupta A.; *Rashid M.U.; *Rupasinghe N.; *Adjepong S.; *Rink J.; *Kirby G.; *Jain R.; *Riera M.; *Parampalli U.; *Pattar J.

Citation:
British Journal of Surgery. Conference: UGI Congress 2021. Belfast United Kingdom. 108 (SUPPL 9) pp. ix34

Abstract:
Background: Acute or hot cholecystectomy (AC) has been established as a safe and efficacious modality of managing acute biliary pathology. However, it has been performed with caution in the elderly (defined by the world health organisation as patients over the age of 65). The NICE guidance in this area does not preclude this practise on elderly patients. Our acute cholecystectomy service treats patients of all ages according to performance status and fitness for surgery rather than age we audited our results in this age group. Method(s): All patients over the age of 65 who underwent acute cholecystectomy in the dedicated emergency cholecystectomy lists were audited from the period starting 31st December 2019 to 31st June 2021. Patient demographics, co-morbidies and surgical factors were recorded. The primary outcomes measure was in hospital stay and readmission, secondary outcome were complications and perioperative mortality. Result(s): 41 elderly patients underwent AC during the audit period, (male 18: female 23). Majority of patients had acute cholecystitis 30(73%). The median inpatient stay following surgery was 2 days(range 2-5 days) and the median admission to surgery time was 6 days (range 5-12 days). Only 3(7%) patients had a subtotal cholecystectomy. There was only 3 complications from surgery which were all between a clavien-dindo score of 2 and 3. There were 3 readmission in the immediate post-operative period. There was one 30-day mortality which was from necrotising pancreatitis as a result of ERCP and not from the operation. Conclusion(s): Acute cholecystectomy in this age group appears to be safe and effective way to treat acute biliary pathology and compares similarly to the outcomes in the younger

Timing of surgery following SARS-CoV-2 infection: an international prospective cohort study (2021)

Posted on by

Type of publication:
Journal article

Author(s):
COVIDSurg Collaborative; GlobalSurg Collaborative (COVIDSurg Collaborative includes *Yen Nee Jenny Bo, *Mohammad Iqbal, *Aarti Lakhiani, *Guleed Mohamed, *William Parry-Smith, *Banchhita Sahu of Shrewsbury and Telford Hospital NHS Trust)

Citation:
Anaesthesia, June 2021, Volume 76, Issue 6, Pages 748-758

Abstract:
Peri-operative SARS-CoV-2 infection increases postoperative mortality. The aim of this study was to determine the optimal duration of planned delay before surgery in patients who have had SARS-CoV-2 infection. This international, multicentre, prospective cohort study included patients undergoing elective or emergency surgery during October 2020. Surgical patients with pre-operative SARS-CoV-2 infection were compared with those without previous SARS-CoV-2 infection. The primary outcome measure was 30-day postoperative mortality. Logistic regression models were used to calculate adjusted 30-day mortality rates stratified by time from diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection to surgery. Among 140,231 patients (116 countries), 3127 patients (2.2%) had a pre-operative SARS-CoV-2 diagnosis. Adjusted 30-day mortality in patients without SARS-CoV-2 infection was 1.5% (95%CI 1.4–1.5). In patients with a pre-operative SARS-CoV-2 diagnosis, mortality was increased in patients having surgery within 0–2 weeks, 3–4 weeks and 5–6 weeks of the diagnosis (odds ratio (95%CI) 4.1 (3.3–4.8), 3.9 (2.6–5.1) and 3.6 (2.0–5.2), respectively). Surgery performed ≥ 7 weeks after SARS-CoV-2 diagnosis was associated with a similar mortality risk to baseline (odds ratio (95%CI) 1.5 (0.9–2.1)). After a ≥ 7 week delay in undertaking surgery following SARS-CoV-2 infection, patients with ongoing symptoms had a higher mortality than patients whose symptoms had resolved or who had been asymptomatic (6.0% (95%CI 3.2–8.7) vs. 2.4% (95%CI 1.4–3.4) vs. 1.3% (95%CI 0.6–2.0), respectively). Where possible, surgery should be delayed for at least 7 weeks following SARS-CoV-2 infection. Patients with ongoing symptoms ≥ 7 weeks from diagnosis may benefit from further delay.

Link to full-text [Open access - no password required]

Altmetrics:

SARS-CoV-2 vaccination modelling for safe surgery to save lives: data from an international prospective cohort study (2021)

Posted on by

Type of publication:
Journal article

Author(s):
COVIDSurg Collaborative, GlobalSurg Collaborative (COVIDSurg Collaborative includes *Yen Nee Jenny Bo, *Mohammad Iqbal, *Aarti Lakhiani, *Guleed Mohamed, *William Parry-Smith, *Banchhita Sahu of Shrewsbury and Telford Hospital NHS Trust)

Citation:
British Journal of Surgery. 2021 Sep 27;108(9):1056-1063

Abstract:
Background: Preoperative SARS-CoV-2 vaccination could support safer elective surgery. Vaccine numbers are limited so this study aimed to inform their prioritization by modelling.
Methods: The primary outcome was the number needed to vaccinate (NNV) to prevent one COVID-19-related death in 1 year. NNVs were based on postoperative SARS-CoV-2 rates and mortality in an international cohort study (surgical patients), and community SARS-CoV-2 incidence and case fatality data (general population). NNV estimates were stratified by age (18–49, 50–69, 70 or more years) and type of surgery. Best- and worst-case scenarios were used to describe uncertainty.
Results: NNVs were more favourable in surgical patients than the general population. The most favourable NNVs were in patients aged 70 years or more needing cancer surgery (351; best case 196, worst case 816) or non-cancer surgery (733; best case 407, worst case 1664). Both exceeded the NNV in the general population (1840; best case 1196, worst case 3066). NNVs for surgical patients remained favourable at a range of SARS-CoV-2 incidence rates in sensitivity analysis modelling. Globally, prioritizing preoperative vaccination of patients needing elective surgery ahead of the general population could prevent an additional 58 687 (best case 115 007, worst case 20 177) COVID-19-related deaths in 1 year.
Conclusion: As global roll out of SARS-CoV-2 vaccination proceeds, patients needing elective surgery should be prioritized ahead of the general population.

Link to full-text [Open access - no password required]

Altmetrics:

Effects of pre-operative isolation on postoperative pulmonary complications after elective surgery: an international prospective cohort study (2022)

Posted on by

Type of publication:
Journal article

Author(s):
COVIDSurg Collaborative; GlobalSurg Collaborative (COVIDSurg Collaborative includes *Yen Nee Jenny Bo, *Mohammad Iqbal, *Aarti Lakhiani, *Guleed Mohamed, *William Parry-Smith, *Banchhita Sahu of Shrewsbury and Telford Hospital NHS Trust)

Citation:
Anaesthesia. November 2021 Nov, Volume 76, Issue 11, Pages 1454-1464.

Abstract:
We aimed to determine the impact of pre-operative isolation on postoperative pulmonary complications after elective surgery during the global SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. We performed an international prospective cohort study including patients undergoing elective surgery in October 2020. Isolation was defined as the period before surgery during which patients did not leave their house or receive visitors from outside their household. The primary outcome was postoperative pulmonary complications, adjusted in multivariable models for measured confounders. Pre-defined sub-group analyses were performed for the primary outcome. A total of 96,454 patients from 114 countries were included and overall, 26,948 (27.9%) patients isolated before surgery. Postoperative pulmonary complications were recorded in 1947 (2.0%) patients of which 227 (11.7%) were associated with SARS-CoV-2 infection. Patients who isolated pre-operatively were older, had more respiratory comorbidities and were more commonly from areas of high SARS-CoV-2 incidence and high-income countries. Although the overall rates of postoperative pulmonary complications were similar in those that isolated and those that did not (2.1% vs 2.0%, respectively), isolation was associated with higher rates of postoperative pulmonary complications after adjustment (adjusted OR 1.20, 95%CI 1.05–1.36, p = 0.005). Sensitivity analyses revealed no further differences when patients were categorised by: pre-operative testing; use of COVID-19-free pathways; or community SARS-CoV-2 prevalence. The rate of postoperative pulmonary complications increased with periods of isolation longer than 3 days, with an OR (95%CI) at 4–7 days or ≥ 8 days of 1.25 (1.04–1.48), p = 0.015 and 1.31 (1.11–1.55), p = 0.001, respectively. Isolation before elective surgery might be associated with a small but clinically important increased risk of postoperative pulmonary complications. Longer periods of isolation showed no reduction in the risk of postoperative pulmonary complications. These findings have significant implications for global provision of elective surgical care.

Link to full-text [Open access - no password required]

Altmetrics:

SARS-CoV-2 infection and venous thromboembolism after surgery (2022)

Posted on by

Type of publication:
Journal article

Author(s):
COVIDSurg Collaborative; GlobalSurg Collaborative. (COVIDSurg Collaborative involves *Yen Nee Jenny Bo, *Mohammad Iqbal, *Aarti Lakhiani, *Guleed Mohamed, *William Parry-Smith, and *Banchhita Sahu of Shrewsbury and Telford Hospitals NHS Trust)

Citation:
Anaesthesia, Jan 2022, Volume77, Issue1, Pages 28-39

Abstract:
SARS-CoV-2 has been associated with an increased rate of venous thromboembolism in critically ill patients. Since surgical patients are already at higher risk of venous thromboembolism than general populations, this study aimed to determine if patients with peri-operative or prior SARS-CoV-2 were at further increased risk of venous thromboembolism. We conducted a planned sub-study and analysis from an international, multicentre, prospective cohort study of elective and emergency patients undergoing surgery during October 2020. Patients from all surgical specialties were included. The primary outcome measure was venous thromboembolism (pulmonary embolism or deep vein thrombosis) within 30 days of surgery. SARS-CoV-2 diagnosis was defined as peri-operative (7 days before to 30 days after surgery); recent (1–6 weeks before surgery); previous (≥7 weeks before surgery); or none. Information on prophylaxis regimens or pre-operative anti-coagulation for baseline comorbidities was not available. Postoperative venous thromboembolism rate was 0.5% (666/123,591) in patients without SARS-CoV-2; 2.2% (50/2317) in patients with peri-operative SARS-CoV-2; 1.6% (15/953) in patients with recent SARS-CoV-2; and 1.0% (11/1148) in patients with previous SARS-CoV-2. After adjustment for confounding factors, patients with peri-operative (adjusted odds ratio 1.5 (95%CI 1.1–2.0)) and recent SARS-CoV-2 (1.9 (95%CI 1.2–3.3)) remained at higher risk of venous thromboembolism, with a borderline finding in previous SARS-CoV-2 (1.7 (95%CI 0.9–3.0)). Overall, venous thromboembolism was independently associated with 30-day mortality (5.4 (95%CI 4.3–6.7)). In patients with SARS-CoV-2, mortality without venous thromboembolism was 7.4% (319/4342) and with venous thromboembolism was 40.8% (31/76). Patients undergoing surgery with peri-operative or recent SARS-CoV-2 appear to be at increased risk of postoperative venous thromboembolism compared with patients with no history of SARS-CoV-2 infection. Optimal venous thromboembolism prophylaxis and treatment are unknown in this cohort of patients, and these data should be interpreted accordingly.

Link to full-text [open access - no password required]

Altmetrics:

Direct to surgery treatment of suspected lung cancer – results from a UK lung cancer multidisciplinary team (MDT) (2021)

Posted on by

Type of publication:
Conference abstract

Author(s):
*Manoj Marathe, *Tinaye Mandishona, *Harmesh Moudgil, *Nawaid Ahmad, *Emma Crawford, *Annabel Makan, *Koottalai Srinivasan

Citation:
European Respiratory Journal 2021 58 Suppl 65, OA2640

Abstract:
Introduction: The selective resection of suspicious nodules and masses without pre-operative tissue diagnosis is an established treatment that can shorten time to curative lung cancer treatment. We evaluated the outcomes of this practice in our local MDT.
Methods: We performed a retrospective review of 84 patients with curatively resectable single lung lesions who underwent surgical resection from January 2017 to December 2018 without histological diagnosis.
Results: Malignancy was confirmed in 68/84 (81%) patients. 57/68 patients were diagnosed with a primary lung malignancy and 11/68 with metastatic disease. Figures 1 and 2 show significant and non significant differentiators determined by the chi squared test.
Conclusion: These results support the use of spiculated and / or irregular lesion appearance along with SUV uptake >=2.5 as significant pre-histology differentiators of malignant and benign lesions. Neither past history of cancer nor size of lesion in isolation were predictive of malignancy. Our study gives further evidence that a direct-to-surgery approach is a suitable treatment option for appropriate suspicious nodules.

Link to abstract

Paediatric Injuries Pre And During COVID-19 Requiring an Operative Intervention: The District General Hospital Experience (2021)

Posted on by

Type of publication:Conference abstract

Author(s):*Howard E.; *Arshad S.; *Kabariti R.; *Roach R.

Citation:British Journal of Surgery; Sep 2021; vol. 108, Supplement 6

Abstract:Aim: To assess the effect of lockdown and the following summer period on paediatric trauma patients who required an operative intervention in a district general hospital. Method(s): A single centre retrospective audit was performed on all paediatric patients <16 years requiring an operative intervention. Two study periods were assessed-pre-COVID (22/03/2019-30/09/2019) and during the COVID-19 pandemic and subsequent summer period (26/03/ 2020-26/09/2020). Data were collected on patient demographics, type of injury sustained, and intervention performed. Result(s): During the COVID-19 pandemic 119 operations were performed, compared to 238 operations performed before the pandemic. Distal radius fractures were the most common injury both during and before the pandemic. However, during the pandemic there was a higher incidence of both hand injuries and lower limb lacerations. The most common type of operation both before and during the pandemic was manipulation under anaesthetic, but there was an increased incidence of washouts performed during the pandemic. Conclusion(s): Despite extensive restructuring of services due to COVID-19, 119 operations were performed during the pandemic. However, this is 119 fewer operations than the same period of the previous year. The reduced rate of operations could be a consequence of increased parental supervision, and less outdoor activity during the pandemic period, but further research is necessary.

Link to full-text [no password required]

Emotional Resilience and Bariatric Surgical Teams: a Priority in the Pandemic (2021)

Posted on by

Type of publication:Conference abstract

Author(s):Graham Y.; Mahawar K.; Omar I.; *Riera M.; Bhasker A.; Wilson M.

Citation:British Journal of Surgery; Oct 2021; vol. 108, Supplement 7

Abstract:The infection control measures implemented as a result of COVID-19 led to a postponement of bariatric surgical procedures across many countries worldwide. Many bariatric surgical teams were in essence left without a profession, with many redeployed to other areas of clinical care and were not able to provide the levels of patient support given before COVID-19. As the pandemic continues, some restrictions have been lifted, with staff adjusting to new ways of working, incorporating challenging working conditions and dealing with continuing levels of stress. This article explores the concept of emotional labour, defined as 'inducing or suppressing feelings in order to perform one's work', and its application to multidisciplinary teams working within bariatric surgery, to offer insight into the mental health issues that may be affecting healthcare professionals working in this discipline.

Link to full-text [no password required]

23-hour stay following total parathyroidectomy in renal patients (2021)

Posted on by

Type of publication:Conference abstract

Author(s):*Neophytou C.; *Chang J.; *Howard E.; *Houghton A.

Citation:British Journal of Surgery; Oct 2021; vol. 108, Supplement 7

Abstract:Aim: Total parathyroidectomy in end-stage renal failure (ESRF), is an effective way to improve or stabilise calcium and parathormone levels and thus improve renal osteodystrophy. Previous BAEST guidelines were not in favour of true day-case neck surgery due to the risk of airway compromise from bleeding. Additionally, ESRF patients are at risk of profound hypocalcaemia after total parathyroidectomy. Patients undergoing total parathyroidectomy are prescribed Alfacalcidol 4mcg daily for 5 days prior to surgery. Following surgery under GA on a morning list, the potassium and calcium levels are checked in the afternoon. Calcium levels are then monitored daily for 3 days and subsequently when required. Oral Alfacalcidol is continued at the same dose until the nephrologists advise otherwise. Method(s): All ESRF patients undergoing total parathyroidectomy for secondary hyperparathyroidism were identified between 01/01/2005 and 31/12/2019 from a prospectively maintained electronic database. Demographics, biochemistry, length of stay (LoS) and outcomes were analysed. Result(s): There were 43 (30 male) total parathyroidectomies. The median age was 53 (range 14 – 78), and median LoS 1 day (range 0 -13). 26 patients (60%) were discharged within 23 hours (26% were day-case). Prolonged stay was due to calcium replacement (n=8) or dialysis (n=4) requirements. Pre- and post-operative calcium values over 2.49mmol/L were significantly related to 23-hour stay (p=0.010482 and p=0.000263 respectively). No 30-day re-admissions were observed Conclusion(s): Careful patient selection and adherence to a perioperative management protocol in total parathyroidectomy may enable early discharge within 23 hours. Preoperative calcium levels help predict this outcome.

Link to full-text [no password required]

Fascial defect closure in laparoscopic incisional/ventral hernia: A systematic review and meta-analysis of published randomized, controlled trials (2021)

Posted on by

Type of publication:Conference abstract

Author(s):Rehman S.; *Akhtar M.S.; Khan M.; Sains P.; Sajid M.S.

Citation:British Journal of Surgery; Oct 2021; vol. 108, Supplement 7

Abstract:Aims: Closure of fascial defect (CFD) during laparoscopic incisional/ ventral hernia repair (LIVHR) remains a controversial issue which requires further investigations to reach a solid conclusion. The objective of this study is to present a systematic review comparing the outcomes of randomized controlled trials evaluating the defect closure versus no-defect closure in patients undergoing LIVHR. Method(s): A systematic review of randomized, controlled trials reporting the fascial defect closure in patients undergoing LIVHR until January 2021 published in Embase, Medline, PubMed, PubMed Central and Cochrane databases was performed using the principles of metaanalysis. Result(s): A total of four RCTs involving 443 patients were included. In the random effects model analysis, using the statistical software Review Manager, defect closure during LIVHR showed no difference in hernia recurrence (risk ratio (RR), 0.89; 95% CI, 0.31, 2.57; z=0.21; P=0.84). In addition, the post-operative complications (RR, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.41, 1.16; z=1.41; P=0.16), duration of operation (Standardized mean difference (SMD), -0.04; 95% CI, -0.52, 0.43; z=0.18; P=0.86) and hospital stay (SMD, 0.27; 95% CI, -0.02, 0.56; z=1.80; P=0.07) were also statistically similar in both groups. CFD was associated with an increased post-operative pain score (SMD, 1.82; 95% CI, 0.61, 3.03; z=2.95; P=0.003). Conclusion(s): Fascial defect closure in patients undergoing LIVHR does not demonstrate any superiority over no-defect closure in terms of recurrence, post-operative morbidity, post-operative pain duration of operation and length of hospital stay.

Link to full-text [no password required]