Thromboembolism

SARS-CoV-2 infection and venous thromboembolism after surgery (2022)

Posted on by

Type of publication:
Journal article

Author(s):
COVIDSurg Collaborative; GlobalSurg Collaborative. (COVIDSurg Collaborative involves *Yen Nee Jenny Bo, *Mohammad Iqbal, *Aarti Lakhiani, *Guleed Mohamed, *William Parry-Smith, and *Banchhita Sahu of Shrewsbury and Telford Hospitals NHS Trust)

Citation:
Anaesthesia, Jan 2022, Volume77, Issue1, Pages 28-39

Abstract:
SARS-CoV-2 has been associated with an increased rate of venous thromboembolism in critically ill patients. Since surgical patients are already at higher risk of venous thromboembolism than general populations, this study aimed to determine if patients with peri-operative or prior SARS-CoV-2 were at further increased risk of venous thromboembolism. We conducted a planned sub-study and analysis from an international, multicentre, prospective cohort study of elective and emergency patients undergoing surgery during October 2020. Patients from all surgical specialties were included. The primary outcome measure was venous thromboembolism (pulmonary embolism or deep vein thrombosis) within 30 days of surgery. SARS-CoV-2 diagnosis was defined as peri-operative (7 days before to 30 days after surgery); recent (1–6 weeks before surgery); previous (≥7 weeks before surgery); or none. Information on prophylaxis regimens or pre-operative anti-coagulation for baseline comorbidities was not available. Postoperative venous thromboembolism rate was 0.5% (666/123,591) in patients without SARS-CoV-2; 2.2% (50/2317) in patients with peri-operative SARS-CoV-2; 1.6% (15/953) in patients with recent SARS-CoV-2; and 1.0% (11/1148) in patients with previous SARS-CoV-2. After adjustment for confounding factors, patients with peri-operative (adjusted odds ratio 1.5 (95%CI 1.1–2.0)) and recent SARS-CoV-2 (1.9 (95%CI 1.2–3.3)) remained at higher risk of venous thromboembolism, with a borderline finding in previous SARS-CoV-2 (1.7 (95%CI 0.9–3.0)). Overall, venous thromboembolism was independently associated with 30-day mortality (5.4 (95%CI 4.3–6.7)). In patients with SARS-CoV-2, mortality without venous thromboembolism was 7.4% (319/4342) and with venous thromboembolism was 40.8% (31/76). Patients undergoing surgery with peri-operative or recent SARS-CoV-2 appear to be at increased risk of postoperative venous thromboembolism compared with patients with no history of SARS-CoV-2 infection. Optimal venous thromboembolism prophylaxis and treatment are unknown in this cohort of patients, and these data should be interpreted accordingly.

Link to full-text [open access - no password required]

Altmetrics:

Recurrence patterns for venous thromboembolism-who is most at risk? (2014)

Posted on by

Type of publication:
Conference abstract

Author(s):
*Crawford E., *Moudgil H., *Naicker T., *Ahmad N., *Srinivasan K.

Citation:
European Respiratory Journal, September 2014, vol./is. 44 Supp 58

Abstract:
National guidance regarding the treatment of venous thromboembolism (VTE) advocates anticoagulating newly diagnosed patients for three months, followed by consideration of indefinite anticoagulation to reduce the risk of recurrent VTE in certain clinical situations. (NICE Clinical Guideline CG144, issued June 2012.) There is recent evidence that although deep vein thromboses (DVT) and pulmonary emboli (PE) are manifestations of the same disease, their patterns of recurrence and hence future morbidity and mortality risk are different. (Baglin, T. et al. Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis 2010; 8(11):2436-2442.) We undertook a retrospective case-note review of 416 patients diagnosed with a VTE event within our institution between January 2010 and January 2011 to assess risk and pattern of VTE recurrence. 35 patients (8.4%) had a recurrent VTE event in the 3 years following diagnosis. Median time to recurrence was 12 months (mean 16.5, SD 10.5). None of the patients were anticoagulated at the time of recurrence and no patients died as a result of their thromboembolic event. Patterns of VTE recurrence The majority of patients with recurrent VTE in our study presented as a further DVT and as such, could be considered at lower risk of associated morbidity and mortality compared to those presenting with PE. Clinicians should consider the likely presentation of any further VTE recurrence as part of their assessment before advocating indefinite anticoagulation in these patients, particularly as the introduction of new oral anticoagulant drugs is likely to make the logistics of prescribing lifelong anticoagulation less complex.

Link to more details or full-text: http://erj.ersjournals.com/content/44/Suppl_58/P4114.short?rss=1

 

The diagnosis of malignancy following a venous thromboembolic event-how high is the risk? (2014)

Posted on by

Type of publication:
Conference abstract

Author(s):
*Crawford E., *Moudgil H., *Naicker T., *Ahmad N., *Srinivasan K.

Citation:
European Respiratory Journal, September 2014, vol./is. 44 Supp 58

Abstract:
UK guidance on the treatment of venous thromboembolism (VTE) recommends that patients with a first, unprovoked VTE should be screened for malignancy. This is based on two historical population-based studies which suggest that between 7.5 and 11% of patients diagnosed with an unprovoked VTE will develop cancer in the following two years. (Murchison, J. T. et al. Br J Cancer 2004;91(1):92-95. Baron, J.A. et al. Lancet 1998; 351(9109):1077-1080.) We wanted to compare local figures with this historical data in order to aid local guideline development. A retrospective case note review identified 417 patients within our institution diagnosed with VTE between January 2010 and January 2011. Ten of these patients (2%) developed cancer in the two years following diagnosis. Results In 2 out of 10 of these patients, tests performed as part of the routine work-up for VTE identified abnormalities that ultimately led to a diagnosis of cancer. None of the patients had extensive malignancy screening as advocated by current UK guidance. Within our local population, the risk of developing cancer in the two years following an unprovoked VTE appears to be significantly less than figures quoted in the literature. UK guidelines may not reflect current medical practice, which could be identifying cancer earlier, nor does it take into account the possibility of regional and national variations of disease. A cautious approach should be taken when counselling patients regarding future cancer risk and when considering further investigations for malignancy.

Link to more details or full-text: http://erj.ersjournals.com/content/44/Suppl_58/P4115